AP Biology · Unit 7 · Topic 7.4
Not all evolution is selection. Run the same population at two sizes and measure how much of the change is nothing but chance.
Learning objective 7.4.A Explain how random occurrences affect the genetic makeup of a population, and 7.4.B describe the role of random processes in the evolution of specific populations.
Every population below starts at the same allele frequency and faces no selection at all. Each generation, the alleles that make it into the next one are drawn at random from the ones present. That sampling is the whole mechanism — and it is enough.
| Population size | Average final frequency | Spread of outcomes | Fixed or lost | Variation left |
|---|
The first column of the table is the point most often missed. Drift is not a weak version of selection and it does not push an allele anywhere: averaged over two hundred populations the frequency has not moved at any size. What changes with population size is not where a population ends up but how far it can get — and in a small population it can get all the way.
Population genetics predicts that the variation held by a population under drift should fall by a factor of (1 − 1/2N) every generation. The simulation was never given that formula — it draws alleles at random and counts what it gets.
| Population size | Variation left, simulated | Variation left, predicted |
|---|
The source population holds four alleles at this locus, one of them rare. A crash leaves a handful of survivors, chosen entirely at random — nothing about any allele makes its carriers more or less likely to survive. The left-hand bars are the source population; the right-hand ones are what a single crash of that severity actually left behind.
Now nothing goes wrong at all. A dozen individuals leave the source population and settle somewhere new. Their allele frequencies — whatever they happen to be — become the frequencies of everyone descended from them.
| Outcome for the rare allele | Share of foundings |
|---|
A rare recessive disorder found in one in four thousand people worldwide can be found in one in fifty on a small island, and nothing about the island needs to favor it. If one of the original settlers happened to carry the allele, its frequency in that founding group was set by chance at a value it could never have reached by selection — and with little immigration since, that frequency has simply stayed.
Each line is one population, all starting at the same frequency, all run for sixty generations. One of drift, selection and gene flow is acting. Look at a single line and then at all forty.
Two populations, one at 0.90 and one at 0.10, exchanging some fraction of their members each generation. This is the only process on this page that makes populations more alike rather than less.
| Migration rate | Difference after 60 generations | Fraction of the original difference left |
|---|
Non-random mating — here, individuals preferring partners of their own type. Watch the allele frequency column and the genotype columns separately.
| Generation | Allele frequency p | AA | Aa | aa | Aa if mating were random |
|---|
| Process | Changes allele frequencies? | Creates new variation? | Direction |
|---|
| Population size | New copies expected each generation |
|---|
The last row is the reason mutation is not negligible in the way the first row makes it look. A single population of a thousand waits fifty generations for one new copy at this locus; a species of ten million gets two hundred every generation. Mutation is slow per individual and relentless per species.
Answer these in your own words before you open the answers.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.